Friday, January 18, 2013

Review: Cinders and Sapphires by Leila Rasheed

Cinders & Sapphires by Leila Rasheed
Get It | Add It
Hardcover, 400 pages
Expected publication: January 22nd 2013 by Disney-Hyperion
One house, two worlds...

Rose Cliffe has never met a young lady like her new mistress. Clever, rich, and beautiful, Ada Averley treats Rose as an equal. And Rose could use a friend. Especially now that she, at barely sixteen, has risen to the position of ladies’ maid. Rose knows she should be grateful to have a place at a house like Somerton. Still, she can’t help but wonder what her life might have been had she been born a lady, like Ada.

For the first time in a decade, the Averleys have returned to Somerton, their majestic ancestral estate. But terrible scandal has followed Ada’s beloved father all the way from India. Now Ada finds herself torn between her own happiness and her family’s honor. Only she has the power to restore the Averley name—but it would mean giving up her one true love . . . someone she could never persuade her father to accept.

Sumptuous and enticing, the first novel in the At Somerton series introduces two worlds, utterly different yet entangled, where ruthless ambition, forbidden attraction, and unspoken dreams are hidden behind dutiful smiles and glittering jewels. All those secrets are waiting . . . at Somerton.


It wouldn't be a lie to say that I wanted to read this because of the cover and its obvious Downton Abbey inspiration, but it also wouldn't be a lie to say I probably would never have actively sought this out, because of those things, and because reasons.  But when its pretty self showed up* in my mailbox before Christmas, luring me in the packets of Walkers shortbread and Twinings English Breakfast tea - well, frankly it was just too tempting a scene to pass up. So picture me, curled up on the couch, dunking my biscuits in a steaming cuppa, ready to sink into a (hopefully) nice little bit of turn of the century escapism. Maybe the tea and sugar (and butter. My god, the butter in those biscuits!) did their job and lulled me after a time, because after a jarring bit in the beginning when I felt sure this book and I were not going to get on, we somehow became reluctant friends. Confidants, even.

But lets get that first bit out of the way, shall we? It's the dreaded insta-love. And I mean insta. Like, pretty sure it happened on about page 2, with two characters who'd never met, had no business being alone unchaperoned (at night. On a ship!), and both of whom acted out of character/station. It had me gasping behind my fan, I can tell you. With this, my guard was definitely up, and when you add in some of the anachronistic/unrealistic approach to the story, I was all prepared to heartily dislike this. BUT as much as I wanted to be bothered by this (and the complete lack offoundation in their sudden "relationship"), I eventually just gave in. I mean, the times, they were a-changin', and it is the lit equivalent of a soap opera, so whatever. I certainly would have preferred anticipation and build-up in the relationship - in a few relationships, actually, as they were all on the risque side; come to think of it, I would much have preferred this to be a sweeping saga that really wrenched every bit of drama out of the interactions... -  but I had to face the facts that this was just never going to be that type of story, and I could dig my heels in or I could enjoy it. And when I came to (grudging) terms with that, I did thoroughly enjoy myself.

Yes, this was heavily inspired by Downton Abbey. Not just the time/setting, but even the plot points - kind of a "ripped from the headlines" approach in some ways, which is fine so long as you make it your own. And that was sort of the point of this book, after all, and the reason I wanted to read it, so I can't really hate... Like Downton, there are a lot of characters to keep track of. Actually, if I'm being honest, there were too many characters to keep track of, especially when they're not all that distinct. There were a few times I had to flip back and figure out who someone was, where they came in, and why they were significant. This is something dealt with much easier on screen, where people have distinct looks and there are all kinds of visual clues in how they dress/carry themselves to remind us where they fit into the story. Much harder on the page, when the story is flitting back and forth between plot-lines and the reader is left to keep track of who's who and how they know each other (compounded by the fact that just about everyone in the book is just now becoming acquainted with one another...). Because of that, I imagine this would be a frustrating book for some people. Eventually I got them all worked out, though, and even grew to sort of care about of few of them (surprise!). It's also very quick-moving, and some readers may feel rushed about. (I've already mentioned I would like a little more lingering... but at least the quick pace kept things lively.)

In the end, I have to say, I enjoyed it. It's anachronistic, but fun; not for diehard traditionalists, certainly - if you like your historical dramas to be sweeping and epic and (most of all) painstakingly researched and historically accurate, this is probably not the book for you. This isn't a book that will have you building ballrooms in your mind, or feeling as if it's so lovingly rendered that you practically lived it with the characters. No, this is not that. But for those looking for something fun to tide them over in between seasons of Downton, or for a nice bit of easy escapism, a good guilty pleasure read, it certainly ticks all the boxes. And though I don't know that the series will ever be one of my jumping-eager, gotta-have-it, breathlessly-awaiting-the-next series, I'm definitely curious to see what happens next at Somerton. I'll have a nice supply of tea and biscuits waiting...


* Thanks, Disney Hyperion!

10 comments:

  1. This sounds pretty similar to The Luxe books, and I love Downton Abbey, so maybe I'll give this one a shot!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hmm, sounds nice, but my list of books to read is pretty full right now, so unless I see a copy in the library I think I'm unlikely to read it for a little while.

    ~Ailsa

    ReplyDelete
  3. Insta love? NOOO!!!! That's one of my biggest pet peeves, right next to love triangles. I have a copy of this one from Disney-Hyperion as well, so I'll be giving it a shot eventually, but it's good to have a heads up going in.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Just plow through the beginning, Natalie. The insta is INSTA, but for some reason, I think it's easy to set aside in this case, and the book - though fluff-like - is worth it and quick.

    ReplyDelete
  5. You know what, it sounds like a fun read! I'll give it a go. Thanks for the review, Misty :))

    ReplyDelete
  6. My pleasure. =)

    And Taylor, in my notes I compared this to The Luxe repeatedly - the difference being I liked this, and didn't like The Luxe.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I've never actually watched Downtown Abbey and therefore wonder if I would like this book. I am NOT a fan of insta love (it even bothered me when I watched Les Mis), and I think I would have a hard time getting over that. But meh, maybe I'll give it a go. If I have a free couple of hours.

    Thanks for the review.

    Sara @ Just Another Story

    ReplyDelete
  8. no!!!!!! insta-love

    i'll think about

    tnx 4 the review

    ReplyDelete
  9. I actually ended up hating the Luxe series as a whole. So the fact that you liked this one... Eh, I guess I'll give it a shot eventually.

    I feel like there will be no surprises if the plot points are too similar to Downton.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Not a single surprise to be found, Cialina, but it still manages to be enjoyable.

    ReplyDelete

Tell me all your thoughts.
Let's be best friends.